Free Consultation
#cmmc
#nist

CUI Protection Requirements for DoD Contractors

August 24, 2021

CUI Protection Requirements for DoD Contractors

CUI protection requirements are built on a complicated regulatory basis. Get a sense of standards, requirements, and regulations around CUI Updated on September 12, 2024 Protection of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in non-federal systems is an issue of paramount importance for both governmental and non-governmental organizations. This statement applies especially to the Department of Defence (DoD) and its contractors because they support the national warfighter and contribute to the development of the US defense industry. One of the latest legal updates regarding CUI protection in the defense sphere is DFARS 252.204-7021, which obligates DoD contractors to achieve the appropriate level of Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) to ensure adequate CUI protection. As for now, most federal contractors are actively conducting NIST SP 800-171 assessment pursuant to DFARS 252.204-7020 and DFARS Case 2019-D041. A successful NIST SP 800-171 assessment should become the bridge to any contract award with federal agencies as well as to further CMMC certification. The compliance requirements for CUI may appear to be complicated or even confusing; however, they help establish standardized and reliable protection of CUI residing in non-federal information systems. In this article, we will try to unscramble confusion with the CUI-related legislation and explain what all the regulations and requirements around CUI aim for.

What is CUI?

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is information that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls pursuant to and consistent with applicable laws, regulations, and government-wide policies but is not classified. Simply put, CUI is data that is created or possessed by, on behalf of the US federal government, which is not classified but is required to be protected by law, regulation, or policy. The executive branch protects many specific categories and subcategories of the CUI. A complete list of those may be found in the CUI Registry. In general, CUI is an umbrella term encompassing:

Such a large amount of sensitive data demands extended requirements for handling and dissemination. Let’s see the main CUI protection requirements below.

The Importance of CUI Protection

Protecting CUI is vital for national security, as it often involves sensitive government and defense-related data, which, if exposed, can disrupt national critical operations. Proper CUI protection and compliance practices not only help prevent CUI breaches but also keep a competitive advantage in the defense environment. Maintaining the confidentiality of CUI builds trust with federal agencies and partners and raises chances for contract awards while avoiding financial losses. Protecting CUI is crucial for keeping sensitive government and defense data secure. A breach could expose important operations, putting national security at risk. Plus, staying compliant with regulations like NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS helps avoid legal trouble and protects your reputation. Safeguarding CUI also means preventing data breaches that could leak valuable business information, like trade secrets. By securing CUI, you maintain trust with federal agencies and partners while protecting your organization from financial loss and staying competitive in the market. To understand the importance of CUI protection, one should first go back to 2010, when Executive Order 13556 was issued. The order established a program that aimed to standardize how the federal branch handles unclassified information, including a detailed explanation of what the CUI is and suggestions on how to protect it. Thus, as stated in the order,

Order 13556 instructed the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop a shared framework for addressing cybersecurity concerns. After extensive collaboration with the industry partners, NIST Special Publications immediately specified a set of safeguarding requirements for CUI.

NIST Contribution to CUI Protection

To assert the complete moderate impact baseline required for CUI protection in the executive branch, NIST first introduced its Special Publication NIST SP 800-53Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems (initially published in 2005). The publication defined requirements for federal information systems and provided federal agencies and contractors with security and privacy controls, along with guidance on choosing the appropriate data protection measures for their organization’s needs. The publication had several reviews, and the last one occurred in 2020. Thus,

NIST 800-53 cleared up the issue of CUI protection in the federal sphere; however, it initiated a concern about applying its requirements in non-federal systems. There were several reasons for the problem. First, the NIST SP 800-53 controls were developed initially for federal systems and did not fully address CUI concerns in the non-federal dimension. Second, some of the publication’s controls were not applicable outside the US Government or even were too granular when applied to the contractor’s system. Finally, some baseline controls (e.g., Availability controls) appeared unnecessary for CUI protection for federal contractors. The solution was to develop a separate standard for the protection of CUI in nonfederal organizations. For this purpose, NIST suggested several guiding sources for protecting CUI in nonfederal organizations:

Get more valuable insights about the recent NIST 800-171 updates.

Compliance Requirements for CUI Protection

NIST SP 800-171 establishes methods to meet the requirements for safeguarding covered defense information as outlined in DFARS. It specifies 110 security controls as requirements, divided into 17 security categories. Here’s a summary of the 17 security categories Access Control: Managing who has access to sensitive information, including CUI and is crucial to minimize the risk of unauthorized access. Implement role-based access control (RBAC) to ensure that only authorized personnel can access specific information. Awareness and Training: Regularly train your personnel on CUI security best practices. Rise awareness of emerging threats, such as phishing and social engineering, to ensure users are equipped to recognize and prevent security incidents and minimize the possibility of human error. Audit and Accountability: Monitor all system activities related to CUI. Always utilize audit log tools to trace breaches back to their source and take corrective actions promptly. Configuration Management: Control changes to system hardware and software. This would help prevent system vulnerabilities that can pose a risk to CUI. Identification and Authentication: Verify user, process, or device identities before granting access to CUI and other valuable assets. Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) to minimize hackers’ attempts to compromise credentials. Incident Response: Regularly test and update the incident response plan to ensure your business can respond quickly, minimizing damage and recovering from incidents more efficiently. Maintenance: Regularly patch and update your system to ensure it remains secure against new vulnerabilities. Media Protection: Safeguard physical media like hard drives and USBs from unauthorized access. Encrypt data on removable media and establish strict handling procedures to add an extra layer of security to your CUI. Risk Assessment: Identifying and analyzing potential risks is fundamental to proactive security management. By conducting regular risk assessments, organizations can anticipate vulnerabilities and prioritize their mitigation efforts, enhancing overall resilience against threats. System and Communications Protection: Protect CUI at rest and in transit by providing encryption and firewalls are key safeguards. Use network segmentation to prevent attackers from moving laterally within the environment. System and Information Integrity: Employ real-time monitoring tools and integrity checks to quickly detect and respond to suspicious activity, ensuring data remains trustworthy. Planning. Develop, document, and disseminate to organizational personnel the policies and procedures needed to satisfy the security requirements for the protection of CUI. System and Service Acquisition. Apply systems security engineering principles at all stages of product development to design trustworthy, secure, and resilient systems and reduce the susceptibility of organizations to disruptions, hazards, and threats. Supply Chain Risk Management. Develop a plan for managing supply chain risks associated with the research and development, design, manufacturing, acquisition, delivery, integration, operations, maintenance, and disposal of the system, system components, or system services that touch CUI. Each category in NIST SP 800-171 addresses a critical aspect of cybersecurity, collectively working to protect sensitive defense-related information from a wide range of potential threats.

DFARS Cybersecurity Regulation

The implementation of NIST SP 800-171 and other related publications within the defense environment was mandated by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). As we defined earlier in the text, the latest DFARS requirement regarding CUI protection is the CMMC certification. However, before developing CMMC, specific cybersecurity requirements within the DoD were identified by:

The above clauses required DoD contractors to adopt NIST’s necessary cybersecurity processes and standards (especially NIST SP 800-171) and, thereby, strengthen the resilience within the defense sector. However, they did not provide specific audit or certification requirements to provide an assurance mechanism for adequate protection. The vague demands and lack of control resulted in a slow and, sometimes, unsatisfiable adoption of the above-mentioned regulations when most contractors only managed to achieve a minimal level of cybersecurity hygiene practices. To strengthen the security of CUI, DFARS introduced more strict requirements in regard to assessment and audit (November 2020). First, DFARS declared formal evidence of NIST 800-171 self-assessment as the primary condition for any contract award. Second, it created a special CMMC framework to finalize efforts for the standardization of CUI protection by requiring a strict audit process and third-party certification:

CMMC Framework to Protect CUI

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is the security framework mandated by the DoD to evaluate and enhance the state of cybersecurity within the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) sector. The framework is intended to become a verification mechanism ensuring that DIB organizations possess appropriate cybersecurity practices and processes to protect data within their environments. Thus, CMMC regulates the implementation of cybersecurity across the DIB sector. Any organization that holds DoD contracts or acts as a subcontractor should prepare for obtaining CMMC certification.

To amend the above DFARS clauses and make the implementation of NIST SP 800-171 Assessment Methodology and CMMC framework more coherent, DoD released an Interim Rule (or DFARS Case 2019-D041). The Interim Rule aims to provide DoD with the ability to assess a contractor's implementation of NIST SP 800-171 security requirements and assurance that DIB contractors can adequately protect CUI in a multi-tier supply chain.

Conclusion

To summarize, if one understands the reasons for CUI compliance requirements, they become not complicated but necessary. Modern digital realities require safeguarding CUI residing both in federal and non-federal information systems. To ensure adequate protection of CUI and other sensitive federal information within the government information systems, NIST SP 800-53 is used. Non-federal organizations, in turn, should rely on CUI security controls represented in NIST SP 800-171 and NIST SP 800-172. Implementation of the NIST controls within the defense environment is mandated through DFARS clauses, the last of which requires a scalable CMMC certification for all DoD contractors to verify the adequate implementation of the compliance requirements for CUI. For more information about the NIST SP 800-171 assessment, CMMC model, and any other related information regarding CUI protection requirements, please contact the Planet 9 expert team. We’ll be happy to assist.

Book a Free Consultation

Schedule a free consultation today to explore how Planet 9 can help you achieve your security and compliance goals.
Book Free Consultation

FAQs

How does a PTCISO service differ from hiring a full-time CISO?
A part-time CISO offers the same strategic oversight and expertise as a full-time CISO but on a flexible, cost-effective basis. It’s ideal for small to mid-sized businesses that need executive-level guidance without the overhead.
Is a virtual CISO service suitable for regulated industries like healthcare or finance?
Yes, virtual CISOs (or fractional CISOs) are especially valuable for industries with strict compliance requirements such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, or GLBA. They help ensure your organization meets regulatory standards and is prepared for audits.
What can I expect during a vCISO engagement?
Our vCISO service typically includes cybersecurity assessments, program development, compliance planning, incident response strategy, vendor risk management, and ongoing executive reporting tailored to your business.
How do I know if my business needs a CISO-as-a-Service?
If you lack in-house security leadership, struggle with compliance, or face growing cyber risks, a vCISO can fill that gap, providing strategic direction, improving resilience, and helping you make smarter security investments.

Related blog posts